Your goal with a diversified portfolio is not for everything to go up or down at once, that's basically the opposite of diversification, FENY for oil XLF Financials IEMV for Emerging Markets. MGK vs. VUG: Head-To-Head ETF Comparison The table below compares many ETF metrics between MGK and VUG. I do 67% VTI and 33% VXUS. They have been doing miserably since their inception. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. ARKK has performed very well; despite some dramatic swings from the GBTC exposure. So when the US market goes down, my whole portfolio goes down. I have mgk and a smaller postion in vug. Youay be interested in the ARK funds as well. Thanks in advance! Intel Corp. data-center sales sank more than expected in the third quarter, sending shares down 10% in after-hours trading Thursday. By the way, VOO is already 3.9% AAPL and MGK is 8.7% AAPL. But they both have the same idea. Have you tried googling it? Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Vug is similar to mgk but spread over 250 growth companies instead of mgk's 100. All in all, there’s nothing wrong with MKG as an ETF per se but I don’t know why you would be tilting your portfolio in those three directions. Can someone also explain to me why I'm seeing so many articles hyping up VEA and VWO? Sorry I dont think I understand your response? Then get some REIT exposure through VNQ. I love their funds and etfs. A diversified take on the S&P 500, the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT:VOO) is an excellent way to match the market, as the five-year chart shows it does almost … Where in the world is that? Gets you US Equity, International Equity, and Fixed Income; although, if you're just doing a buy and hold strategy (ie no rebalancing) you're not going to realize the full benefits of diversification. If you love mid and small caps (i.e. Or you could do an international etf like VXUS. Someone please try to convince me why this is bad. VOO (50%), VO (25%), and VBR (25%) with a Vanguard non-retirement account (to avoid commissions). Both are good options for what you say you want to accomplish so it comes down to where you want it to come from and which you think is more reliable. Understand Vanguard's principles for investing success. Stocks ETFs are stock ETFs regardless of the style. I'd got with Google. If you are investing in ETFs, you are pursuing a diversification strategy. There isn't any discussion after that that doesn't involve your feelings. At first glance, it looks like they have the same risk as direct trades. Hello there, Romanian citizen here and as most of you know, the laws in Europe don't "allow" you to own some USA ETFs or stocks. VTI and VOO have substantial overlap, is there a reason you hold both? What's your opinion on this? Does it make sense to get 1 fund instead of 2? So there's a potential for much more upside IMO. Can you explain in a few more sentences as to what I can google ? It really honestly comes down to what you want extra weight towards. Per their own explanations, they split their portfolio over 4 categories of "Transformational Changes", with 25% allocated to each, and no more than 2% in any company. FWIW VMGAX is the same thing for MGK but the minimum is even higher at $5m. I’ll 1 up. Expensive but if it keeps gaining like that I guess it's worth it. NO. )I don't want to be that guy who only criticizes, so here are the 3 I'd offer: VT - you're fine there. I just started and wanted to look for highest return. So you could get partial shares of like Amazon without having to buy a whole share (1500ish?). Why do you want a US Mega-Cap Growth ETF instead of a total market ETF like VT? There’s no reason you couldn’t include MGK in your portfolio but also no compelling reason to. However, you did note that you're happy to give up returns for low volatility. Are these three generally better than just throwing into a target retirement fund? Heard good things about it. I am pretty new to personal finance and investing but have been really inspired by O'Shaughnessy's book What Works on Wall Street.. I'm in the same position you are, and originally I thought I wanted to go VGT for tech exposure. Check out VIGAX it's Mutual fund version of VUG which is very similar to MGK, https://www.zacks.com/funds/etf/MGK/holding, https://www.zacks.com/funds/etf/VUG/holding, https://investor.vanguard.com/mutual-funds/profile/overview/vigax. Cookies help us deliver our Services. Can someone also explain to me why I'm seeing so many articles hyping up VEA and VWO? VGT tracks very simple sector index. VTI is 3624 holdings by comparison. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. But if Tech continues to dominate, MGK will still do well. 1.) (with reasoning preferably), VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) AGG (iShares Core US Aggregate Bond ETF). VEH - Vanguard ETF for Europe. Get your ETF recommendation online. Compare ETFs vs. mutual funds. you're about to pitch me on why they're a good idea), why not go all in on small caps? So instead of adding VB, if I add corporate bonds that's good. Just wondering - would it be better to shift to Vanguard due to company structure? Anyway, combining the small and midcap lets your 3rd pick diversify your portfolio. Stocks ETFs are stock ETFs regardless of the style. Although some brokers give you the choice to acquire them through a CFD with no leverage ( VOO for example ). Any allocation you give to bonds is to help you sleep at night - not because bonds are a smart investment at that age. Welcome to the Exchange Traded Funds subreddit. Press J to jump to the feed. There are correlation differences but they are minimal. 100% for people pre-retirement. For instance, if I own a US stock market ETF such as VOO (S&P 500), adding an ETF with mainly US stock market exposure, let's say VB (Small Caps) will not achieve a great deal of diversification. I am pretty new to personal finance and investing but have been really inspired by O'Shaughnessy's book What Works on Wall Street.. To optimize this strategy, you need to find uncorrelated assets to invest in. I use Charles Schwab so I use their ETFs, but mostly for asset classes/markets that I can't invest as much time into. So when the US market goes down, my whole portfolio goes down. Check out m1 finance. I'll take up 5% while you're up 15% and down 10% while you're down 40% all-day long. PLUS, if there is a new revolutionary industry like Tech that emerges in the next year, I'll be guaranteed to catch it with something like QQQ or MGK than I would if I was specifically in Tech. 2. Period. thanks, the minimum as stated here is 100K, I wish I had that kinda money on me. I built a thing that monitors Reddit for … I figure simple is better and with those two ETFs I can hold every single US and international equity. BND - the total U.S. bond market, weighted based on your age and/or risk tolerance. On the flip side $FONE dabbles in a lot of tech that isn't necessarily strictly smartphone related.